Solutions
Your first hunt, live this afternoon.
Free to start · No download for participants
Use 15 leadership activities for teams to strengthen communication, decision-making, trust, and management skills with clear facilitation guidance.
Leadership development sticks when it’s built on reps, not lectures. The best activities feel close enough to real work that lessons transfer the next morning, yet safe enough that people try new behaviors without fear of penalty. That’s the balance this set aims for: practical, repeatable, and built from patterns we see actually shift team behavior.
A quick grounding helps. Leaders mostly grow by doing, with targeted reflection and coaching tightening the loop. That’s the spirit behind the 70-20-10 idea for development from the Center for Creative Leadership and the experiential learning cycle described by the University of Florida’s overview of Kolb’s four stages of learning. When you anchor activities to real decisions in the flow of work, transfer improves, a pattern also seen in Deloitte’s guidance on learning in the flow of life.
You’ll find 15 leadership activities below with clear facilitation notes and debriefs. Adjust length and group size to fit your context. Resist the temptation to overproduce. Clear rules and visible stakes beat elaborate props every time.
People learn leadership situationally. Put them in decision, delegation, and conflict moments with safety to try, miss, and adjust, and you’ll see faster growth. That loop of do–reflect–apply maps to the experiential cycle summarized in UF’s Kolb explainer, and it’s why simple activities, done well, routinely beat long slide decks.
Nobody quits a game they’re winning. Start with a quick, guaranteed win to unlock effort.
Builds: Risk realism, bias detection, better precommitments.
Run it: State the decision. Assume it failed badly six months from now. In silence, everyone lists reasons why. Share, cluster, pick the top risks, and design preventions and early warning signals.
Debrief: Which risks changed the plan today? What bias did we catch early?
Works because it uses “prospective hindsight,” popularized by Gary Klein’s HBR piece Performing a Project Premortem.
Builds: Candor under pressure, strategy toughness, clearer assumptions.
Run it: Present a current strategy in five minutes. A rotating “red team” has equal time to stress-test it. The owner earns points for noted assumptions and mitigations, not for defending pride.
Debrief: Which assumption carried the most risk? What data changes our mind fastest?
Builds: Delegation clarity, empowerment with limits.
Run it: Pick a real upcoming task. The manager writes a one-line outcome and three guardrails (budget, timing, must/never). The assignee paraphrases the job back and names their first move. Swap roles.
Debrief: What did “done” actually mean? Where did autonomy feel unclear?
Builds: Idea quality, inclusive contribution, listening through reading.
Run it: Give a prompt. Everyone writes one idea in 60–90 seconds, passes the page, and quietly builds on the next idea. Three rounds, then discuss clusters and pick testable options.
Debrief: Which ideas improved most through builds? Who did we hear that we usually miss?
Builds: Shared understanding, concise communication, rework prevention.
Run it: One person briefs a task. The receiver has to write the brief they heard and read it back. Only clarifying questions allowed. Adjust and lock.
Debrief: What was assumed but unsaid? What one sentence made delivery easier?
Builds: Direct feedback, low defensiveness, quicker course-correction.
Run it: In small circles, each person gives one Situation–Behavior–Impact message and receives one. Keep it specific and behavior-based.
Debrief: What phrasing reduced defensiveness? What action will you try first?
If you need a primer, CCL’s overview of the SBI feedback model is concise and practical.
Builds: Decision speed, fewer replays, role clarity.
Run it: Pick one recurring cross-functional decision. Map who proposes, who consults, who decides, and who is informed. Simulate the next cycle with these roles enforced.
Debrief: Where did we still bottleneck? What will we try differently next time?
Builds: Prioritization, consensus-building, evidence-based debate.
Run it: Present a short survival scenario with 10–12 items. Rank individually first, then as a team. Compare spreads and defend changes with reasons, not volume.
Debrief: What shifted your mind? Which criteria did we actually use?
Builds: Experimentation, iteration speed, learning from small failures.
Run it: Use the classic marshmallow-and-spaghetti build, but require at least three iterations. Short test cycles beat grand designs.
Debrief: What did we learn from version one that improved version two?
Builds: Empathy for opposing views, better decisions through strong counterarguments.
Run it: On a live topic, assign two small groups opposite positions. Each group must present the other side’s strongest argument before making their own case.
Debrief: What part of the other view improved our plan?
Psychological safety increases when dissent is normalized, a pattern highlighted in Google’s Project Aristotle work on team effectiveness summarized by re:Work.
Builds: Precision communication, trust under constraint.
Run it: In pairs, one person is eyes-only; one is voice-only. Navigate a simple course with specific, pre-agreed language. Swap.
Debrief: Which instructions worked consistently? Where did ambiguity creep in?
Builds: Negotiation, coalition-building, give-and-get clarity.
Run it: Mixed puzzle pieces are split across teams. Teams must negotiate, trade, or lend to complete their image. Add a constraint that every trade must include a reason.
Debrief: What made others say yes? What did we learn about our own style?
Builds: Faster alignment, bias check on “pet” projects.
Run it: Everyone gets numbered cards. Reveal a backlog item and silently select priority. Flip together, discuss outliers, revote quickly. Move on.
Debrief: What patterns did we notice in our criteria? Where did evidence change minds?
Builds: Distributed leadership, rapid decision cycles, morale through earned wins.
Run it: Turn your office, campus, or event space into a fast-moving leadership lab. Teams complete varied challenges that require rotating a point leader, fast delegation, and clear communication. If you want to automate prompts, submissions, scoring, and a live feed across locations, a purpose-built scavenger hunt app keeps logistics light so facilitators can focus on people.
Sample challenge set:
Debrief: Where did leadership naturally rotate? What behaviors improved with time pressure?
Builds: Learning agility, accountability for improvement, cultural candor.
Run it: Immediately after a project or activity, answer four prompts: What was supposed to happen? What actually happened? Why the difference? What will we sustain or change next time?
Debrief: Capture one behavior to repeat and one to adjust. Revisit at the next checkpoint.
For a straightforward reference, the Army’s leader materials describe how AARs drive self-discovery and performance improvement; see the accessible overview of AAR practice in TC 7‑0.1 context and a concise PDF guide, The Leader’s Guide to After‑Action Reviews.
They’re built around real decisions, delegation moments, and feedback, not party games. Each activity ends with a short debrief and a concrete next step so behavior change doesn’t die in the room. That alignment to work mirrors the 70-20-10 emphasis on learning by doing from the Center for Creative Leadership.
Short is fine. Run tight cycles that fit your agenda and attention. What matters more than duration is visible stakes, clear rules, and a debrief that captures one specific behavior to try on the job.
Favor silent ideation first, then voice for convergence. Use cameras only when it adds value, and keep instructions precise. Activities like silent brainwriting, reverse briefs, and decision premortems work smoothly in shared docs and lightweight boards.
Separate people from ideas, and reward steel‑manning the opposing view. Invite senior voices last to avoid anchoring. Google’s Project Aristotle synthesis on re:Work highlights psychological safety as foundational to team effectiveness.
Track tangible shifts: clearer decision owners, fewer decision replays, faster time to decide, and higher rate of constructive challenge. Use brief AARs to record “repeat” and “adjust” behaviors and review them in your next team meeting.
Use tools to handle prompts, submissions, and scoring when you need scale or distributed participation. Keep the human parts human: framing, facilitation, and feedback. That balance reflects Deloitte’s view that learning sticks best when it’s integrated into the flow of work, not bolted on; see their 2019 analysis of learning in the flow of life.
You could, but you don’t need to. Pick two or three that fit your current moment, run them well, and close the loop next week. In our experience, repetition with reflection beats volume every time.
The right leadership activities make passive participation active. Choose a few, run them with intent, and your team will feel the difference where it counts: in faster, clearer, kinder decisions that stick.
